Hi George,

why e.g. 'win.IA32' not just 'win'?

Thanks,
Mikhail

2006/2/24, George Harley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Redrawing the proposed layout as it didn't render quite correctly for me
> when I read over the sent note (sigh).
>
>
>   <SECURITY ROOT>
>         |
>         |
>         +---src
>         |   |
>         |   +---main
>         |   |   |
>         |   |   +---java
>         |   |   |   |
>         |   |   |   +---common
>         |   |   |   |
>         |   |   |   +---linux.IA32
>         |   |   |   |
>         |   |   |   \---win.IA32
>         |   |   |
>         |   |   +---native
>         |   |   |   |
>         |   |   |   +---linux.IA32
>         |   |   |   |
>         |   |   |   \---win.IA32
>         |   |   |
>         |   |   \---resources
>         |   |       |
>         |   |       \---common
>         |   |
>         |   +---test
>         |       |
>         |       +---java
>         |           |
>         |           +---common
>         |           |
>         |           +---linux.IA32
>         |           |
>         |           \---win.IA32
>         |
>         +---doc
>         |   |
>         |   \---images
>         |
>         +---make
>         |   |
>         |   \---native
>         |       |
>         |       +---linux
>         |       |
>         |       \---windows
>         |
>         +---META-INF
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> George
> IBM UK
>
>
>
> George Harley wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Earlier on today I spent some time following the instructions for
> > developing Harmony Java code inside Eclipse [1]. After experimenting
> > with archive, luni and nio I decided to check out modules/security and
> > found that, in its current form, it can't be brought into an Eclipse
> > workspace and used like the other modules. One obvious difference is
> > that it doesn't have any Eclipse project metadata in there (e.g.
> > .project and .classpath files). After adding these in (in my private
> > workspace), I began to look at other differences between security and
> > its peer modules in particular the difference in source layouts.
> > Recalling some ideas for layouts that have been kicked around this list,
> > I started to move things around a little to try and make things a little
> > more uniform with respect to those peer modules. Things were made more
> > interesting by virtue of the following security module distinctions :
> >
> > * it has platform-specific Java code
> > * it contains native code for both Windows and Linux
> >
> > Eventually I arrived at a structure that is more attuned to the other
> > modules in the repository. As a bonus, Eclipse pointed out several
> > missing import entries from the META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file - including
> > one that cannot presently be satisfied with what is in the Harmony
> > repository (org.apache.harmony.security.test.SecurityTest wants to
> > import java.util.logging.LoggingPermission which doesn't exist in the
> > repository - although an implementation has been contributed [2]).
> >
> > In addition to moving source around, I also made the necessary tweaks to
> > the Ant scripts contained in the security module plus the "top level"
> > Java build file trunk/make/build-java.xml so the Ant builds still work
> > as before.
> >
> > Keeping my fingers crossed that the next bit of this note renders
> > alright in your mail client, here is the modules/security structure that
> > I ended up with (minus all of the package sub-folders for clarity) :
> >
> >  <SECURITY ROOT>
> >        |
> >        |
> >        +---src
> >        |   |
> >        |   +---main
> >        |   |   |
> >        |   |   +---java
> >        |   |   |   |
> >        |   |   |   +---common
> >        |   |   |   |
> >        |   |   |   +---linux.IA32
> >        |   |   |   |
> >        |   |   |   \---win.IA32
> >        |   |   |         |   |   +---native
> >        |   |   |   |
> >        |   |   |   +---linux.IA32
> >        |   |   |   |
> >        |   |   |   \---win.IA32
> >        |   |   |
> >        |   |   \---resources
> >        |   |       |
> >        |   |       \---common
> >        |   |        |   +---test
> >        |       |
> >        |       +---java
> >        |           |
> >        |           +---common
> >        |           |
> >        |           +---linux.IA32
> >        |           |
> >        |           \---win.IA32
> >        |
> >        +---doc
> >        |   |
> >        |   \---images
> >        |
> >        +---make
> >        |   |
> >        |   \---native
> >        |       |
> >        |       +---linux
> >        |       |
> >        |       \---windows
> >        |
> >        +---META-INF
> >
> >
> > All of the leaf folders under "src" have been declared to Eclipse as
> > source folders (i.e. I have 9 source folders called
> > "src/main/java/common", "src/main/resources/common",
> > "src/main/native/linux.IA32", "src/test/java/common" and so on...).
> >
> >
> > I would be really keen to hear what people think of this prototype
> > re-structuring. It would be great if we could make the security module
> > as simple to work with inside Eclipse as the other modules are.
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > George
> > IBM UK
> >
> >
> > [1]
> > http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/dev_eclipse.html
> >
> > [2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-88
> >
>
>

Reply via email to