On 4/3/06, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] > > Personally, I'd raise JIRA's one at a time when you have fixes > prepared. That way they can be discussed and we can firm up our > policy on matching behaviour. >
Not completely agree. I believe bug report should be done immediately when the problem is discovered. That is the only garantee it is never lost. Besides, sometimes a person who found a problem and a person who makes a patch are not the same :-). Talking about the original Alex's question I think we should have separate JIRA issues for each diffirence. As I remember we decided to document all the deviations and discuss them if they are not trivial. The way how we document them is a special JIRA category, right? So, tracking each deviation independent allows us to discuss them and change the category in case we would like to preserve the deviation. Makes sense? -- Anton Avtamonov, Intel Middleware Products Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
