On 4/11/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mikhail Loenko wrote: > > It's not too late to think about it once again and probably revisit > > the decision. > > BTW, I don't think of this as a blanket rule-of-law, but rather a > guideline, a motivation for how we make decisions on a bug-by-bug or > issue-by-issue basis. > > > As I understand goal #1 is to meet needs of as many potential users as we > > can > > and decision to be spec incompatible in favor of new hot RI version might be > > not the best one. > > I think I agree :)
Mikhail makes it sound like this is just an aberation in the RI - and I might agree with you/him if I thought that is what it was - but as I mention earlier both IBM and BEA implementations have the same behaviour. Do we really want to take a different path to what must be the most common 5.0 implementations? Regards, Mark. -- Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> IBM Java Technology Centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
