For example, you have
org.apache.harmony.luni.internal.net.www.protocol - package under test
org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.internal.net.www.protocol - package for
the test
where if it's an implementation test since it's an 'internal' package,
wouldn't the the test most likely be
o.a.h.l.i.n.w.p ?
(no "tests")
It should also be possible to have a testcase
java.util.HashMapTest
if we want to test some internal thing about j.u.HM?
geir
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Geir
What kind of conventions do you mean?
If it is package naming then I thought we have the same conventions
for all types of the tests: bootclasspath tests go to the same package as
class, classpath tests go to o.a.h.module.tests.package
Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/4, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> 2006/5/3, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Ok, I'll put this on the website
>
> I've put it on the web-site (it has not appeared yet)
>
> Comments are welcome
I think you only captures half of it. You also need to describe
conventions for harmony-specific tests...
I'm happy to help there if you want...
geir
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
