Rana Dasgupta wrote:
Hi,
Is there an expectation of a standardised deployment model for the Harmony
compliant VM's like DRLVM and others? Eg., should they all produce binaries
that can be unpacked to overlay the Harmony Classlib deployment structure
as can the IBM VME? At some point, we will be posting distributions for
both
class libraries and VM on the Harmony site; they should be deployable on a
user machine in some standard way.
Maybe. I think we have a lot of learning to do here.
geir
Thanks,
Rana
On 5/17/06, Andrey Chernyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> deploy/
> \----jdk
> |----include
> \----jre
...
> 2) I was wondering how this change will affect the DRLVM? I notice from
> building
> the VM locally that it produces a deploy\jre\bin structure, so I
imagine
> that some
> small path changes to build scripts would be necessary (similar to the
I think this specific change shouldn't directly affect the DRLVM
building script since it takes the Harmony class libraries in a source
form.
If we, however, want to adjust the JRE image produced by the DRLVM
building script, then I guess the only line that will have to be
changed (in build/make/build.xml) is:
<!-- product binary deploy location -->
<property name="build.deploy.dir"
location="../${build.os.short}_${build.arch}_${build.cxx}_${build.cfg
}/deploy/jre"
/>
I can include it as a next "cumulative patch".
Surely, some more updates will have to be done for xml files at
build/make/components in case the classlibs will be split by modules
in future.
Thanks,
Andrey.
On 5/17/06, Oliver Deakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ive just opened HARMONY-469 which contains a patch to rearrange the
> current layout
> of the deploy directory into:
>
> deploy/
> \----jdk
> |----include
> \----jre
>
> This is a preliminary step to reorganising the native code and using
the
> deploy directory
> as an HDK (as discussed else where in this topic [1] & [2]).
>
> If/when this patch is accepted and applied, there are a couple of
issues
> that may affect
> us that I thought would be worth bringing to general attention:
>
> 1) The IBM VME is laid out to unpack with the same directory structure
as
> the current deploy directory i.e. it overlays into
> deploy/jre/bin/default. If there is a new
> jdk directory added into the structure, then the VME will no longer
> unpack into the
> right place, which might confuse new developers hoping to try out our
> code. I am
> currently working on making a VME which reflects the new layout
> available, and I will
> send a note to the list once it is ready (this would be after
> HARMONY-469 was
> applied).
> Developers that are already using a VME in their workspace will simply
> need to move
> the deploy/jre/bin/default directory to deploy/jdk/jre/bin/default.
>
> 2) I was wondering how this change will affect the DRLVM? I notice from
> building
> the VM locally that it produces a deploy\jre\bin structure, so I
imagine
> that some
> small path changes to build scripts would be necessary (similar to the
> changes I
> had to make in HARMONY-469).
>
> Regards,
> Oliver
>
> [1]
>
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/200605.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> [2]
>
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/200605.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --
> Oliver Deakin
> IBM United Kingdom Limited
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
