Vladimir Gorr wrote: > maybe does it make sense adding the RI rt.jar to CLASSPATH for the > ECJ-based > compiler? > In this case all we didn't implemented will be taken from RI. Is this a > stupid idea?
You can add the RI's class libraries using a command-line option if you so choose, but I don;t think we should build the Harmony javac to have dependencies upon the RI. Anyone want to get to work on j.u.Scanner ;-) ? Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
