javac and java are from the same distrib (javac does not print
detailed version info,
that is why I''m mentioning java version),
so it is javac 1.5.0_b64
so I compile with JDK 1.5.0_b64, run on Harmony and it fails
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/6/7, Jimmy, Jing Lv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> 2006/6/7, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> The Sun 1.5.0_06 compiler was driven directly by our build scripts (so
>> using jsr14) and the Eclipse 3.2RC4 compiler has source 1.5 target 1.4
>> set.
>>
>> I could throw an IAE from Enum#valueOf(Class, null) when the Enum is
>> empty, but seems a bit of a drag to work around the compilers.
>>
>> (which version of BEA javac?)
>
> javac -version prints just "1.5.0"
> java -version prints "build 1.5.0-b64"
>
I would bet the tests shall pass if using javac of java-version "build
1.5.0_01" or later :)
And as the tests also fail on RI of "build 1.5.0-b64" (I've just find
one:) ), I guess it is a bug of RI, which was fixed in the later version.
What's more, shall we also suggest that everyone use a latest version of
javac to avoid such problem?
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>> Mikhail Loenko wrote:
>> > Are you compiling with "jsr14" as our build does?
>> >
>> > I'm using BEA javac with "jsr14" it compiles to something like this:
>> > for(i=0; i < values.length; i++ )
>> > if( values[i].name().equals(argument) )
>> > return values[i].name().equals(argument)
>> > throw IAE
>> >
>> > 2006/6/7, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >> Maybe compiler specific.
>> >>
>> >> Looking at Proxy.Type it appears that the Sun compiler 1.5.0_06
>> >> delegates to the Enum type:
>> >>
>> >> public static Type valueOf(String name)
>> >> {
>> >> return (Type)Enum.valueOf(
>> >> Proxy.class$java$net$Proxy$Type != null ?
>> >> Proxy.class$java$net$Proxy$Type :
>> >> (
>> >> Proxy.class$java$net$Proxy$Type =
>> >> Proxy._mthclass$("java.net.Proxy$Type")
>> >> ),
>> >> name);
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> and the Eclipse compiler 3.2RC4 looks up the constant itself:
>> >>
>> >> public static Type valueOf(String s)
>> >> {
>> >> Type atype[];
>> >> Type type1;
>> >> for(int i = (atype = ENUM$VALUES).length; --i >= 0;)
>> >> if(s.equals((type1 = atype[i]).name()))
>> >> return type1;
>> >> throw new IllegalArgumentException(s);
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> In the Sun compiler a null name argument gets passed to
>> >> Enum#valueOf(Class, String) where I check and throw NPE.
>> >>
>> >> In the Eclipse compiler the line if(s.equals(...)... will cause a NPE
>> >> iff there are entries in the VALUES array (otherwise it doesn't go
>> into
>> >> the for-loop) and throws an IAE without going into my code.
>> >>
>> >> Maybe I can withdraw the null name test while we settle this?
>> >
>> > We now have 3 tests failing
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Mikhail
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Tim
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Andrew Zhang wrote:
>> >> > Hi, Stepan,
>> >> >
>> >> > The test you metioned is passed in my environment:
>> >> > RI version: 1.5.0_02.
>> >> > Linux: Read hat Enterprise Linux AS(2.4.21-15.EL)
>> >> >
>> >> > Is the problem caused by earlier version javac?
>> >> >
>> >> > I remember that RI of earlier verion throws IAE instead of NPE
>> when the
>> >> > arguement is null.
>> >> >
>> >> > Would you please check "java" version?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 6/7/06, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I found the reason - tests expect NPE when valueOf(null) is invoked
>> >> but
>> >> >> IAE
>> >> >> is thrown instead. For example,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
>> >> >> at org.apache.harmony.tests.java.lang.EnumTest$Sample.valueOf(
>> >> >> EnumTest.java
>> >> >> :22)
>> >> >> at
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.harmony.tests.java.lang.EnumTest.test_valueOfLjava_lang_String
>> >> >> (EnumTest.java :113)
>> >> >> at
>> >> java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.invokeV(AccessibleObject.java:205)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> Stepan.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 6/7/06, Andrew Zhang wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Hello Stepan and Mikhail,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > All tests passed on my machine.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Which test case was failed in your environment, on RI or Harmony?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On 6/7/06, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Hi Tim,
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > On 6/7/06, Tim Ellison wrote:
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > > Heads up that I completed the implementation of j.l.Enum
>> >> today; so
>> >> >> you
>> >> >> > > > can go mad and use enum types in classlib code for real now.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Cool!
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > I wrote a bunch of tests but if you could hammer on it and
>> try to
>> >> >> break
>> >> >> > > > it that would be good :-)
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > And did you run it? :-) It fails for me :-(
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Thanks,
>> >> >> > > Stepan.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > If you take a look at the implementation [1] of valueOf(Class,
>> >> >> String)
>> >> >> > > > it uses reflection to get the enum constant values. I'm not
>> >> sure
>> >> >> how
>> >> >> > > > 'popular' the valueOf() method is, but since the values don't
>> >> >> change
>> >> >> > > > they are a good candidate for being cached if it proves to be
>> >> >> called
>> >> >> > > > frequently. I'm happy to do that if people think it is
>> >> worthwhile.
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > > Regards,
>> >> >> > > > Tim
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > > [1]
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/luni/src/main/java/java/lang/Enum.java?revision=412166&view=markup
>>
>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>> >> IBM Java technology centre, UK.
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>> Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>> IBM Java technology centre, UK.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Best Regards!
Jimmy, Jing Lv
China Software Development Lab, IBM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
