Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> do you mean larger?

It may be larger if the last test fails with a walkback ;-) but
generally the build fails part way through, with a message, and the rest
of the log is not written, so it is smaller overall.

Regards,
Tim

I was wondering what the size is so I can see if
> it's the threshold set on the list, or something else...
> 
> geir
> 
> 
> Mark Hindess wrote:
>> Just about to go offline, but I'd guess smaller since not as much works!
>> ;-)
>>
>> -Mark.
>>
>> On 9 June 2006 at 7:01, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> any clue about how big a failed message is (if you can figure that out...)?
>>>
>>> geir
>>>
>>> Mark Hindess wrote:
>>>> The most recent success message was 343k at approximately 
>>>> Fri, 09 Jun 06 11:26:34 +0100.
>>>>
>>>> -Mark.
>>>>
>>>> On 9 June 2006 at 6:33, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> A large message should still generate a bounce...
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll go look to see what the size is.
>>>>>
>>>>> How large are these messages?
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark Hindess wrote:
>>>>>> On 9 June 2006 at 16:55, "Stepan Mishura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
>>> e:
>>>>>>> Hi Tim,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/9/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I see it too.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Stepan / Mikhail, do you get build failures?  Shouldn't we stop putting
>>>>>>>> in new code until this is resolved?
>>>>>>>  I didn't update this particular file because I work separately with
>>>>>>> security module only.
>>>>>>> But I think that you are right - it'd better to stop putting new code on
>>> ce
>>>>>>> we get notification that the build is broken.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW, where is classlib build status emails? I didn't get any notificatio
>>> n.
>>>>>> I think they are failing to get to the list because they are too large.
>>>>>> I tried changing the envelope sender to my gmail account - which is
>>>>>> subscribed to the -commits list, but they still don't make the list
>>>>>> or generate any bounce messages.  I've changed the sender back to
>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as it was originally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>  Mark.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

-- 

Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to