Mark Hindess wrote:
> On 25 June 2006 at 6:42, "Magnusson, Geir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Mark Hindess wrote:
>>> On 24 June 2006 at 22:38, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Mark Hindess wrote:
>>>>> On 24 June 2006 at 14:44, Gregory Shimansky
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> Btw I've figured why kernel.jar has to be added to
>>>>>> bootclasspath.properties before luni.jar. They have many
>>> classes with
>>>>>> the same name but different code (Class, ClassLoader,
>>> Thread, System,
>>>>>> String to mention a few). So if luni.jar goes first in
>>> bootclasspath,
>>>>>> then all of those kernel classes implementations are taken from
>>>>>> classlib which isn't very good because they should be
>>> taken from VM's
>>>>>> kernel.jar. So there is no surprise that it doesn't work.
>>>>> =20
>>>>> Oops... I can't believe we didn't spot this before! ...
>>>> That's a regression :-(  We used to specifically exclude the kernel
>>>> patternsets from each JAR packaging step.  I agree that it should be
>>>> restored.
>>> Yes, it's definitely a regression.  Probably at least partly my fault,
>>> so I've fixed it in r417017.
>>>
>>> Gregory, this should almost fix the ordering issue except for String
>>> which has moved out of the kernel classes in to luni.  But as Tim says
>>> the real solution is to load the VM's versions of kernel classes first
>>> the same way the IBM VME does it.
>> Isn't it better to not have the stubs around at all?  Gets rid of one
>> element of uncertainty - load order.
> 
> The stubs aren't mentioned in the bootclasspath.properties so they
> aren't a problem. 

Right - that wasn't the issue though.

> The problem I was alluding to is that DRLVM predates
> the move of String from the kernel to luni so if DRLVM defines String
> then it's version should be loaded first.  We can't get rid of luni.jar.
> ;-)
> 
> The problem was worse before because there were (unintentionally) some
> stub classes in the luni and security jars.  This was what I fixed in
> r417017.

Great.

geir

> 
> Regards,
>  Mark.
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to