Unfortunately, I can provide some test cases to demonstrate other
constructs, such as X{n}, DO support supplementary characters. But I'm
not sure if other constructs need special processing.
OK, I see, I'll provide general support for supplementary characters,
instead of patching some special functionality like character classes,
thanks for the clue.
And if you'll update regex unit tests with test cases that would be great.
BTW, what's DO?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
