For the example I've started this thread with it seems that complying the spec is more appropriate there. But probably there are other examples that caused that the doc was worded the given way
George and Tim could you please comment? Thanks, Mikhail 2006/6/30, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Anton Avtamonov wrote: > On 6/30/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> But section "Exception-throwing compatibility" says that exceptions >> are different >> and we aim "to be fully compartible with the RI" "by matching the >> exception characteristics of each method". > > I believe that it is for "However, in most cases the specification > does not describe all possible exceptions that may be thrown" case > only. > In case the spec is complete and not looks like a bug I would vote to > follow the spec. +1 from me. > > Wishes, -- Paulex Yang China Software Development Lab IBM --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
