Hi Mikhail, I don't think this description of DatagramSocket constructor is somehow applicable to the Victor's example. In this description we deal with *local* address to bind DatagramSocket to (to receive DatagramPackets). But in the example above 0.0.0.0 is used as a *destination* address for plain Socket to establish a connection to. This is the completely different case IMHO. BTW, I'm not sure it is possible to establish a connection to a wildcard address.
Regards, 2006/7/20, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The documentation of java.net.Socket says nothing about 0.0.0.0 address, but documentation on java.net.DatagramSocket has a reference to it: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/net/DatagramSocket.html "If the IP address is 0.0.0.0, the socket will be bound to the wildcard address, an IP address chosen by the kernel." So it's normal to use 0.0.0.0 and we have a bug. On 7/20/06, Victor A Martynov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Mark, > > I run the example on MS Windows XP, Harmony classlib+DRLVM dated 11 july > 2006. > > c:\test>c:\Harmony\bin\ij -version > Apache Harmony DRLVM HEAD-4807 (2006-05-02), Windows/ia32/msvc 1310, debug > > ===== > Warm Regards, > > Victor Martynov, > Intel Middleware Product Division > > > On 7/20/06, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 20 July 2006 at 15:34, "Victor A Martynov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm having trouble with an application. This problem concerns > creating > > > java.net.Socket on host "0.0.0.0". > > > > What platform? Works for me on Linux (debian testing). > > > > -Mark. > > > > > The test below illustrates this problem: > > > > > > import java.net.*; > > > > > > > > > > > > public class Test { > > > > > > > > > > > > public static void main(String args[]) throws Throwable { > > > > > > ServerSocket ss = new ServerSocket(1099); > > > > > > Socket s = new Socket("0.0.0.0", 1099); > > > > > > } > > > > > > } > > > > > > The output on RI and on Harmony differs: > > > > > > c:\test>java Test > > > > > > c:\test>C:/Harmony/bin/ij Test > > > > > > java.net.ConnectException: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:1099 - The address is not > > > available > > > > > > at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect( > > > PlainSocketImpl.java:238) > > > > > > at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect( > > > PlainSocketImpl.java:200) > > > > > > at java.net.Socket.startupSocket(Socket.java:715) > > > > > > at java.net.Socket.<init>(Socket.java:139) > > > > > > at Test.main(Test.java:7) > > > > > > > > > > > > I wonder whether it is a bug in RI or a bug in LUNI of Harmony? > > > > > > ===== > > > Warm Regards, > > > > > > Victor Martynov, > > > Intel Middleware Product Division > > > > > > ------=_Part_57416_17500570.1153395298489-- > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- Mikhail Fursov
-- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Middleware Product Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
