On 7/21/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> While it's not a critical thing, this seems like something we want to
> put to bed. Tim tried taking a run at this for one of these last week,
> and I'd like to try again.
>
> Would some number of days of discussion (like 3) plus a vote be an
> acceptable way to get this resolved?
Yes. IMHO there is better value in performing a quick comparison and
choosing one to work on and improve, compared to spending a long time
evaluating the two/three impls.
In the case of java.math I think we should pick the new implementation
(H-935 which combines H-380 and H-199 and some of H-551) to improve
from now on.
Regards,
Daniel
It's a good problem to have though.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
