Daniel Fridlender wrote: > On 7/21/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: >> > While it's not a critical thing, this seems like something we want to >> > put to bed. Tim tried taking a run at this for one of these last week, >> > and I'd like to try again. >> > >> > Would some number of days of discussion (like 3) plus a vote be an >> > acceptable way to get this resolved? >> >> Yes. IMHO there is better value in performing a quick comparison and >> choosing one to work on and improve, compared to spending a long time >> evaluating the two/three impls. > > In the case of java.math I think we should pick the new implementation > (H-935 which combines H-380 and H-199 and some of H-551) to improve > from now on.
It doesn't surprise me that you'd say that :) What is your opinion for RMI? geir --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
