On 31/07/06, Salikh Zakirov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex Blewitt wrote:
> Don't get me wrong; being able to specify minimum/maximum is a
> reasonable idea for optimising a VM if you know what to put; but by
> default, there shouldn't be any arbitrary limitations based on the
> value of a #define constant ...

So, would you be satisfied if the VM defaulted to, say, 3/4 of total physical 
memory available?
(not a #define, but a value detected at startup)

I would like to get some concrete practical conclusion from the whole 
discussion.

The question should be: "Why have a maximum?" and not "What should the
maximum be?" An algorithm that implicitly assumes a maximum is wrong.

Alex.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to