Mikhail Loenko wrote: > I'm not sure it's legal to put any classes to sun.* packages > > Opinions?
Yes, it's legal. I think we're going to want to do this for compatibility reasons, and eventually wean people off of it. geir > > Thanks, > Mikhail > > 2006/8/8, Martín Córdova (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> ava.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: sun/misc/BASE64Encoder >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Key: HARMONY-1088 >> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1088 >> Project: Harmony >> Issue Type: Bug >> Environment: Windows XP SP2 latest Harmony JRE as of aug-8-2006 >> Reporter: Martín Córdova >> >> >> Harmony does not include this class. It's not a standard class, but >> has been of common usage for many years, and most JDKs (Sun, IBM and >> BEA) provide it under the SAME package. I think that there is no sense >> in not providing it under the usual package, it just breaks existing >> code. >> >> BTW, this JRE is seems to be running real fast. >> >> >> >> -- >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >> - >> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the >> administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa >> - >> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
