Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: >> Alexei Zakharov wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Sorry for disturbing you again :) but I'd like to announce another >>> code contribution on behalf of Intel. This the independent >>> implementation of Java management console. RI has a built-in console >>> called "jconsole" [1]. BEA has proprietary "JRockit Management > >> Awesome!!! I love it. An eclipse plugin makes *way* more sense than >> separate swing app. > > I have to admit I don't understand that logic completely. I can run a > swing app if I have java. For an eclipse plug in I need eclipse too.. > .anyway, I'm really happy this made it here too. > >> Now I wonder, should this be shipped with harmony or should we make it >> available as another tool? >> >> Either way, I'm already +1 on accepting the patch because it would boost >> the work on the java.lang.management. >> >> Since this tool is dependent on nothing that is harmony specific, I >> think it might be worthwhile starting up as a separate subproject >> supervised by harmony... but I'm not sure this is kosher with the >> current incubation guidelines. > > For now, I think the prudent thing is to just get it into SVN, make it > clear how to use it, and answer this question in a few months time.
To refine this answer a little - I believe that the goals of making it visible, usable, documented, available as a binary in our HDK/JRE are easily achievable w/o having to formally decide on 'subprojectness', if you catch my drift. geir --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
