On 12 September 2006 at 14:44, "Alexei Zakharov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > If this tweaking doesn't affect visible TestNG user interface then I > see nothing bad about converting the sample module. Especially in case > if we have volunteers who cannot stand without it any longer :) > > Another question is, where should we keep this tweaked version? Is > there any place from which it can be downloaded during the build or we > should keep tweaked jar in svn or ...
Either of the options you mention would break the "as long as we do not re-distributed it" requirement that Cedric placed on the tweaked version. The only sane option would be to distribute the tweaking mechanism via svn (or a jar). I think I'd prefer waiting 'til we can run TestNG without tweaking. > BTW, I'm still volunteering to convert beans. Excellent! -Mark. > 2006/9/12, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hello, > > > > I have been discussing with the author of TestNG (Cedric) about > > Harmony using a tweaked TestNG which does not require > > java.util.concurrent. The feedback is we could use the tweaked TestNG > > as long as we do not re-distributed it. So now it's possible to deploy > > TestNG in Harmony. > > > > What do you think we take a simple module (prefs?) to run a pilot? Or > > let's waiting for the completion of j.u.concurrent. Thanks a lot. > > > > Best regards, > > > > -- > > Richard Liang > > China Development Lab, IBM > > > -- > Alexei Zakharov, > Intel Middleware Product Division > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]