I agree with Tim.

This should be a stable document not one that needs frequent updates
(which would only mean contributors would be expected to check it more
often).  Changes should be discussed/agreed first, thus using JIRA/svn
would seem reasonable for this document.

-Mark.

On 28 September 2006 at 10:46, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not trying to be contrary - honest <g> - but I would suggest the
> website.  It is a reference document that doesn't need a collaboration
> area on the wiki.  The document has undergone review and should be
> stable now.
> 
> My 2c.
> Tim
> 
> Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
> > +1 for Wiki. This is a more edit-friendly solution. 
> > I can also add a link to your Wiki page from the website - for people to
> > know where to look for guidelines ;) 
> > 
> > Best regards, 
> > Nadya Morozova
> >  
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 11:21 AM
> > To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [jira] Good issue resolution guideline (was:
> > [classlib]volunteer to supply patches for old JIRAs)
> > 
> > Guys,
> > 
> > Since there is no additional comments on this guideline...
> > 
> > Let's put it somewhere.
> > We got two options: Harmony site and wiki.
> > I prefer wiki because it will be easy to edit it and I can put it
> > there myself :)
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> > 
> > SY, Alexey
> > 
> > 2006/9/26, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> I've combined all the comments again.
> >>
> >> And here is the last version. I hope... :)
> >>
> >> === cut ===
> >> Preface
> >> This guideline covers a wide range of issues but not all of them.
> >> If you cannot do one of the steps, then write a comment to the issue.
> >> Use your common sense!
> >>
> >> Issue reporter:
> >> 1. Explicitly state the expected behavior and the
> >> actual behavior of Harmony code. Use links to specs, rfcs, etc.
> >> 2. Try to create as small a test case as possible. A patch
> >> to test will be highly appreciated.
> >> 3. Provide max. information about steps necessary to recreate the bug.
> >> If a patch for the test has not been supplied, provide as much
> >> diagnostic information about the failure as possible (stack trace,
> >> failure output, expected output etc).
> >> 4. Remember to use issue links if applicable.
> >> 5. Check the issue resolution when it is committed. Add a comment.
> >>
> >> Resolution provider :) :
> >> Depending on the type of issue, do the following:
> >>
> >> 1. Issue is probably a non-bug difference, not a bug or invalid:
> >>   1.1. Discuss on the dev list.
> >>   1.2. Add a link to the discussion thread as a comment to issue.
> >> 2. Issue is a bug:
> >>   2.1. Notify the community that you started investigation by adding
> >> a comment to the issue and send a message to dev list. If you cannot
> >> produce a patch, add another comment with the results of your
> > investigation.
> >>   2.2. If reporter did not provide a patch to test:
> >>       2.2.1. Try to create a patch to test.
> >>       2.2.2. If you cannot produce a patch, write a comment about it.
> >>   2.3. Create a patch to fix the issue
> >>       2.3.1. Any concerns? Discuss on the dev list. Add a link to
> >> discussion as a comment.
> >>   2.4. All the pacthes (test and fix) should be relative to the
> >> directory where the main build.xml is:
> >>
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/tru
> > nk.
> >> Or to the module root directory.
> >>   2.5. Test and fix patches should be in different files.
> >>   2.6. If the patch requires to add, remove or move some files in the
> >> repository, add the appropriate script.
> >>   2.6. Check that all unit tests pass.
> >>   2.8. If it is an application-oriented issue, check the application.
> >>   2.9. Remember to use issue links if applicable.
> >>
> >> Committer:
> >> Depending on the issue type, do:
> >> 1. Issue is a non-bug difference, not a bug or invalid:
> >> Close the issue.
> >> 2. Issue is a bug:
> >>   2.1. If a patch to test is available, apply it.
> >>   2.2. Check that the test fails.
> >>   2.3. Apply the fix for the issue.
> >>   2.4. Check that test succeeds now.
> >>   2.5. Make sure that all unit tests pass.
> >>   2.6. For application-oriented issues, check the application.
> >>   2.7. If there are problems on previous steps, post a comment to
> >> JIRA and let "resolution provider" to resolve.
> >>   2.8. Make sure that the issue reporter is happy with the resolution.
> >>   2.9. Add revision info into JIRA issue
> >> === cut ===
> >>
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> IBM Java technology centre, UK.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to