Alexei Zakharov wrote: >> Now that we have javac, javah, javap (if Tim votes ;) and keytool, I'd > > BTW, we have more tools indeed. I mean RMI tools: > > rmic <-> java org.apache.harmony.rmi.compiler.Main > rmid <-> java org.apache.harmony.rmi.activation.Rmid > rmiregistry <-> java org.apache.harmony.rmi.registry.RegistryImpl > > We can hack the launcher to enable these three tools too. Seven tools > is more than just four. :)
Cool -- yes. I suggest that we create adapters called 'org.apache.harmony.tools.rmic.Main' and so on in tools.jar to keep the tools launcher code simple and consistent. Regards, Tim > 2006/10/2, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Now that we have javac, javah, javap (if Tim votes ;) and keytool, I'd >> like to organize these and add them to the next snapshot. >> >> So I propose adding a new top-level directory called "jdktools" (and >> rename "tools" to "project_tools") and create a build target that - with >> a dependency on classlib for the launcher - creates the 'stuff' needed >> to fill into the JDK. >> >> Any comments? >> >> geir >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
