BTW what if we will have Java component in future (E.g. MMTk's GC)? Will the hidden properties accessible from Java?
On 10/10/06, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/10/06, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mikhail, > BTW, what would you say if all JIT-specific properties were kept > separately? E.g. if there were JAVA, VM, JIT types of properties > storage, would it be of some convenience to JIT side? Just curious :) > I think it would be convenient if we can assign them from the command line. Right now we have -Dvm. -Xem. -Djit. -Dgc. set of properties. You propose to emphasize them with -X prefix, so we have -XDvm. -XDem. and -XDgc. as the result. Your approach is better because the namespaces are separated. It's safer and we remove potential problems when a property with the same name appears in user's code. The old approach is better because it's do the same using less entities. -- Mikhail Fursov
-- Mikhail Fursov
