On 10/10/06, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006/10/10, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > BTW what if we will have Java component in future (E.g. MMTk's GC)? Will the > hidden properties accessible from Java? AFAIU the point is to separate namespaces completely, so that user could utilize any property name and it would not affect JVM in any way. Probably it is possible to map "hidden" properties to Java properties with some prefixes like "o.a.h.drlvm." or "o.a.h.gc" etc. Sounds good. Another option is to provide o.a.h.SystemProperties class for
such a component to access hidden properties from Java. -- Mikhail Fursov
