Yes, I'm agree we should protected them (In the initial letter I was not sure)
+ We have to divide the helpers into the groups: VM helpers, GC helpers. So switching to the different type of GC version only GC helpers implementation will be changed. But this means that GC must provide some of the kernel classes. This is the problem I think. On 10/11/06, Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It all seems reasonable. Regarding #6. Maybe I misunderstand what you are saying but it seems best to put the java vmhelpers in the same isolation as other security sensitive kernel classes.
-- Mikhail Fursov
