Sorry, I probably need more coffee.

What is "This" ?

Do you mean that you have reviewed the patch previously attached by Alexey V.
and found it good enough?

BTW, what is the reason to remove a part of the test? Are the checks invalid
or VM-specific?

Thanks,
Mikhail

2006/10/12, Fedotov, Alexei A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mikhail,

>I don't understand either: "This is a low risk test fix".

Here should be the following text:

This is a fix of the test. Test fixes rarely affect more than one test,
they are local. Hence, they wouldn't produce painful errors which took
many geek/weeks to locate.

With best regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Middleware Products Division

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:57 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid
>testcase in ClassTest
>
>I don't understand either: "This is a low risk test fix".
>
>2006/10/11, Fedotov, Alexei A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Mikhail,
>>
>> I already got several personal feedbacks about these comments. I
accept
>> that they are not good.
>>
>> I tried to express an idea that JIRAs marked with this comment
prevent
>> getting 100% pass rate on DRLVM. When I search for
>> Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM in comments I will get a list of bugs to
fix.
>>
>> Any suggestions how the comment should like? My only requirement is
to
>> keep Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM lexem in this comment.
>
>IMHO It makes sense to discuss it on a separate thread with different
>subject,
>so that other people could notice that discussion and participate
>
>Thanks,
>Mikhail
>
>>
>> With best regards,
>> Alexei Fedotov,
>> Intel Middleware Products Division
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:37 PM
>> >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni]
invalid
>> >testcase in ClassTest
>> >
>> >Hi Alexei
>> >
>> >I'm sorry I comlpetely don't understand your comment (as well as a
>> >number of similar comments in other JIRAs)
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Mikhail
>> >
>> >2006/10/7, Alexei Fedotov (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >>    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-
>> >1670?page=comments#action_12440591 ]
>> >>
>> >> Alexei Fedotov commented on HARMONY-1670:
>> >> -----------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> [drlvm][unit] Blocks
>> >http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM
>> >>
>> >> This is a low risk test fix.
>> >>
>> >> > [classlib][luni] invalid testcase in ClassTest
>> >> > ----------------------------------------------
>> >> >
>> >> >                 Key: HARMONY-1670
>> >> >                 URL:
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1670
>> >> >             Project: Harmony
>> >> >          Issue Type: Bug
>> >> >          Components: Classlib
>> >> >            Reporter: Alexey Varlamov
>> >> >            Priority: Trivial
>> >> >         Attachments: H-1670.patch
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > The test_getDeclaredMethodLjava_lang_String$Ljava_lang_Class of
>>
>modules/luni/src/test/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/java/lang/Clas
>> sTes
>> >t.java
>> >> > checks if IllegalAccessException is thrown during invokation of
>> private
>> >method of inner class. This is bad due to:
>> >> > 1) the check is invalid, see HARMONY-1309 for details;
>> >> > 2) The ClassTest is not appropriate for testing reflection, and
>> this is
>> >already covered in j.l.reflect.* tests.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> >> -
>> >> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
>> administrators:
>> >http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
>> >> -
>> >> For more information on JIRA, see:
>> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to