On the 0x200 day of Apache Harmony Leo Li wrote:
> Posted as *HARMONY-1836* <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1836>
> .
Thanks for the issue!
Is it possible to skip the building process and start from binaries?
Or I should not even try?
> On 10/12/06, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Ok.:)
> >
> > On 12 Oct 2006 13:38:34 +0700, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On the 0x200 day of Apache Harmony Leo Li wrote:
> > > > Hi, Egor:
> > > > I have tried to run it on drlvm, but it reported error:
> > > >
> > > > Assertion failed!
> > > > Progrma: ...java.exe
> > > > File:Object_handles.cpp
> > > > Line:99
> > > >
> > > > Expression: NULL==*p || (*p>=vm_heap_base_address() &&
> > > > *p<vm_heap_ceiling_address())
> > >
> > > There is a similar HARMONY-1560 open (ActiveMQ). Can you give a
> > > comment there (or create a separate JIRA with component "App-Oriented
> > > Bug Reports"), with easy steps to reproduce?
> > >
> > > I'll try on Linux.
> > >
> > > > After I debug into it I got
> > > > (1)
> > > > Unhandled exception at 0x00711eed (harmonyvm.dll) in java.exe: User
> > > > breakpoint.
> > > >
> > > > (2)The call stack is
> > > > > harmonyvm.dll!_assert(const char * expr=0x007bd848, const char *
> > > > filename=0x007bd800, unsigned int lineno=99) Line 295 C
> > > > harmonyvm.dll!GcFrame::add_object(ManagedObject * *
> > > p=0x0013e9cc) Line 99
> > > > + 0x31 C++
> > > > harmonyvm.dll!compile_protect_arguments(Method * method=0x0393da50,
> > > > GcFrame * gc=0x0013e95c) Line 113 C++
> > > > harmonyvm.dll!compile_jit_a_method(Method * method=0x0393da50) Line
> > > 824 +
> > > > 0xd C++
> > > > 013900dd()
> > > > harmonyvm.dll!VM_Statistics::get_vm_stats() Line 325 + 0x14 C++
> > > > harmonyvm.dll!rth_get_interface_vtable(ManagedObject * obj=, Class *
> > > > iid=) Line 674 + 0xc C++
> > > >
> > > > (3)object_handles.cpp
> > > >
> > > > void GcFrame::add_object(ManagedObject** p)
> > > > {
> > > > assert(p);
> > > >
> > > > //fails here:
> > > > *assert(NULL == *p || (*p >= vm_heap_base_address()
> > > > && *p < vm_heap_ceiling_address()));*
> > > >
> > > > *
> > > > * assert(!hythread_is_suspend_enabled());
> > > >
> > > > ensure_capacity();
> > > > nodes->elements[nodes->obj_size+nodes->mp_size] =
> > > > nodes->elements[nodes->obj_size];
> > > > nodes->elements[nodes->obj_size] = (void**)p;
> > > > nodes->obj_size++;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12 Oct 2006 11:55:27 +0700, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On the 0x200 day of Apache Harmony Leo Li wrote:
> > > > > > Hi, all:
> > > > > > I now plan to make the self-host of Derby on Harmony.
> > > > > > Is there anyone interested in this topic?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here is what I encountered in the process. Hope it will be
> > > helpful
> > > > > to
> > > > > > anybody who is interested in it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At first, the testcases even fails on RI both on windows and
> > > ubuntu
> > > > > and
> > > > > > the result are different.???
> > > > > > After some struggiling, I have successfully passed the
> > > provided
> > > > > > testcases on RI after I rebuild the source on my machine.
> > > > > > But there still remains a problem:
> > > > > > The derby team kindly rewrite the launcher for testcases in
> > > order
> > > > > to
> > > > > > treat J9 vm differently if the property java.vm.name starts with
> > > "j9".
> > > > > But
> > > > > > the j9 vm used in Harmony has been customized thus is different
> > > from
> > > > > > traditional j9 vm that is expected by derby. This leads to failure
> > > to
> > > > > launch
> > > > > > tests.
> > > > > > I will talk on Derby's mailing list to find a solution.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it real to run Derby on DRLVM without intelligent tweaking of
> > > > > Derby? I am looking forward at the moment when it is. Please, do not
> > >
> > > > > hesitate to file a bug against DRLVM if you find it performing not
> > > > > very well with Derby. That would be valuable!
> > > > >
> > > > > I tried: 'java org.apache.derby.tools.sysinfo' and it produced a
> > > > > quite-good output on my DRLVM snapshot, but I have no idea, how to
> > > run
> > > > > the tests :)
> > > > >
> > > > > P.S.: Congratulations, all! Today is the 0x200 day of Apache Harmony
> > > > > (if I count it right:) We made a significant progress since. I love
> > > > > the project! Let it keep going well! ;oP
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Egor Pasko, Intel Managed Runtime Division
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Leo Li
> > > > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> > >
> > > --
> > > Egor Pasko, Intel Managed Runtime Division
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Leo Li
> > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Leo Li
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
--
Egor Pasko, Intel Managed Runtime Division
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
