Elena Semukhina wrote: > Classlib test ThreadGroupTest.test_setMaxPriorityI() fails on DRLVM because > it expects behaviour that conflicts with specification. > The test passes on IBM VME and RI. The issue is reported at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1625. > > Actually there is a bug report in > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4708197 which agreed > that > this is a bug in RI and it should be fixed. > > Should we follow RI's behaviour and change drlvm ThreadGroup.java or should > we fix the test?
I'm off-line at the moment so cannot look at the bug details. The question is whether fixing the 'bug' will likely break any applications? Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
