Moreover, the spec obliges us to do so. The real question is: is it RI bug or bug in spec? Personally I am for returning non-null values in all cases.
Regards, 2006/10/16, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
since it's apparently undefined by spec, then putting something informational like "none" or "interpreter-only" would do no harm? geir Tim Ellison wrote: > FWIW in the IBM VM we set to java.compiler="" if the JIT is disabled. > > and the Sun 1.5.0_06 build doesn't set it at all! > > Regards, > Tim
-- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division, Russia --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
