I agree. Just tell me and I will commit the patch for EM(interpreter) and JIT modes.
I agree it will be better if you do this since I'm not very familiar with DRLVM code yet. So +1 for you to go ahead. Regards, 2006/10/16, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 10/16/06, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Moreover, the spec obliges us to do so. The real question is: is it RI > bug or bug in spec? Personally I am for returning non-null values in > all cases. I agree. Just tell me and I will commit the patch for EM(interpreter) and JIT modes. BTW I think that we should create interpreter.emconf file and place all VM properties needed for interpreter into this file. So, in future, when we need to add more interpreter-mode option, we will not affect the EM C++ code.
-- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division, Russia --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
