Mikhail, The situation is possible with some Linux clones. And if we have such a situation I propose to take into account if we have a commiter/volunteer to check this platform. If we have a volunteer - we support it.
Another question is: what if volunteer is gone and no one supports the platform? Will we claim that Harmony no longer supports the platform? On 10/18/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006/10/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Mikhail Loenko wrote: > > 2006/10/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >> > >> Mikhail Fursov wrote: > > I think if we decide to support a platform then we define a set of tests > > that > > must pass on that platform after each commit and we do roll back if they > > fail. That is how I understand "support" > > Lets define support as passing >90% of classlib unit and > smoke/c-unit/kernel in DRLVM It might be a criteria for addition to the set of supported, but can't be a definition. Logically there could be a platform that we don't know, but that platform could pass 99% of the tests, do you think we can support a platform we don't have any idea about? Thanks, Mikhail > > geir > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Mikhail Fursov
