Most of the concurrent code warnings go away with newer versions (from the concurrency scm), but those newer versions also have Java 6 API dependencies, so at the moment we'll have to stick with what we have.
-Nathan On 10/24/06, Denis Kishenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, I skiped this mail, too long topic name =) It's ok to rollback. Actually concurrent module has a lot of warnings and I have started fix them. I have some suggestion about generic warnings. Is Doug Lea subscribed on dev list? 2006/10/20, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 20 October 2006 at 17:21, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Mark, > > > > I suggest that this is rolled back since it is modifying the > > concurrency code in our 'standard' SVN area that we aim to keep in > > close sync with Doug's repository. > > Agreed. I thought about this after doing it then had to make dinner. > > > Perhaps we can offer the patch to that community, and/or set up local > > compiler options to hide the warnings in this module. > > We'd have to take it out of the global compile to do this later, so I > think we should do the former. > > Denis, how do you feel about doing this? > > Regards, > Mark. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Denis M. Kishenko Intel Middleware Products Division
