No problem, let's wait new version.
2006/10/24, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Most of the concurrent code warnings go away with newer versions (from
the concurrency scm), but those newer versions also have Java 6 API
dependencies, so at the moment we'll have to stick with what we have.
-Nathan
On 10/24/06, Denis Kishenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I skiped this mail, too long topic name =)
>
> It's ok to rollback.
>
> Actually concurrent module has a lot of warnings and I have started
> fix them. I have some suggestion about generic warnings. Is Doug Lea
> subscribed on dev list?
>
> 2006/10/20, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > On 20 October 2006 at 17:21, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Mark,
> > >
> > > I suggest that this is rolled back since it is modifying the
> > > concurrency code in our 'standard' SVN area that we aim to keep in
> > > close sync with Doug's repository.
> >
> > Agreed. I thought about this after doing it then had to make dinner.
> >
> > > Perhaps we can offer the patch to that community, and/or set up local
> > > compiler options to hide the warnings in this module.
> >
> > We'd have to take it out of the global compile to do this later, so I
> > think we should do the former.
> >
> > Denis, how do you feel about doing this?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mark.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Denis M. Kishenko
> Intel Middleware Products Division
>
--
Denis M. Kishenko
Intel Middleware Products Division
