Hi All,

I support the idea to have separate JIRA-s for different components.

For tracking such changes spreaded over codebase the JIRA's "subtask"
feature is very usefull - pls see [1,2]

Thanks
-Ilya

[1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1468
[2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1758

On 10/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just a quick note - I have done two DRLVM JIRAs today that also included
patches for the classlib tests.

I accepted the DRLVM part, and rejected the classlib stuff as I think
that it would be cleaner and safer if those proposed changes to the
classlib were entered as separate JIRAs and discussed with the classlib
experts.

I know that as JIRAs evolve,more things get attached, and it's really
cool that we're working together on all parts of the project - as we
should - but it can make it very confusion, so I wanted to just note
this directly.  Comments?

geir



--
Thank you.
Ilya Neverov,
Intel Middleware Products Division

Reply via email to