A Number of additional VTable objects will be proportional to a number of loaded classes, this is considerably less than total number of objects, so "1/10 of the whole heap " digit looks unreal. Any way precise meausrements could be done only after implementation is ready, so I suppose talking about possible 10% performance and footprint decrease is too early :)
Alelsey. On 10/26/06, Ivan Volosyuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The comment was for this statement: > 1) "1/10 of the whole heap is probably very much :)" If we spare 10% of total space for additional objects which doesn't required for computations we may have mentioned peformance decrease on memory intensive usage. -- Ivan On 10/26/06, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/26/06, Ivan Volosyuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It means 10% more pressure on GC subsystem. In memory intensive cases > > it can be up to 10% decrease in performance. > > > > Ivan, > If you have 10% more classes loaded it does not mean that you need 10% more > memory space for all of runtime objects you have. > > -- > Mikhail Fursov
