On the 0x20E day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote: > On 10/26/06, Pavel Pervov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > My statement is based on the following: JIT only needs vtable to call > > (interface) methods. If it's true, then I don't see where it will be > > necessary to enumerate vtables. The only possibility I can imagine is when > > JIT reuse vtable invoking several methods of the same object. > > > Pavel, > here is an example of the devirtualization: eax is an object reference: > > cmp eax,0 ; > je 0131E778 ; > mov ecx,dword ptr [eax] > cmp ecx,13D5250h > > As you see JIT hardcodes vtable as a constant. If you move it - you have to > enumerate it. > > > > All, > Let's allow to Alexey to commit his code as it is and discuss unpinning with > details in future?
+1 I think, discussion was worth it. Now I am aware of the set of features Aleksey introduces. -- Egor Pasko, Intel Managed Runtime Division
