On the 0x20F day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
> While you're at it, I'd like to get this patches in, but we probably
> need a new target for building, as running normally with this
> framework compiled in leads to problems.
>
> Can we find a way to make it a different build target, or at least a flag
>
> -Dwith.jitrino.test.framework
>
> or something?
>
> (Apologies if you've already done that :)
we hope it would be a subset of pre-commit tests. So, this option
should be ON in debug mode. Sounds good?
> geir
>
> Mikhail Fursov wrote:
> > Thank you Ivan.
> > The problem you found with TestRegistry.cpp will be fixed with the next my
> > patch for Jitrino testing framework.
> > I'll check all of your tests this weekend and post comments.
> > On 10/27/06, Ivan Kollegov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi JIT developers.
> >>
> >> I've wrote 4 templates and about 20 tests to test Jitrino's internal
> >> algorithms. I put them all into JIRA-1586
> >>
> >> Also I've founded a problem with testing simplifier.cpp (test
> >> testSimplifyIf). The problem was in
> >>
> >> FlowGraph::foldBranch(ControlFlowGraph& fg, Node* block, BranchInst*
> >> br, bool isTaken)
> >>
> >> {
> >> assert(br == block->getLastInst());
> >> assert(block->getOutDegree() == 2);
> >> fg.removeEdge(block->getOutEdge(isTaken ? Edge::Kind_False :
> >> Edge::Kind_True));
> >> br->unlink();
> >> }
> >>
> >> The variable "block" can be null. This problem can be fixed with patch
> >> in JIRA-1986
> >>
> >> Also, I had problems with race condition with initializing of static
> >> section in TestRegistry* TestRegistry::getInstance(){
> >>
> >> Could you check the changes?
> >>
> >
>
--
Egor Pasko, Intel Managed Runtime Division
