Thanks! AFAIK RI uses interpreter and could use OSR, while we do almost the same with a simple JIT without any advanced techniques. Not so bad :) + BEA must be slower than SUN in such tests.
On 11/1/06, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
3754ms on RI versus 5740ms on Harmony to startup Tomcat. Seems about 50% slower as well. On 11/1/06, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have not got the precise number. I will try it.:) > > On 11/1/06, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Good news! However I never believe in 100% :) > > > > You mentioned that startup with Harmony is slower then RI. I measured > > Eclipse3.1.1 startup some time ago and DRLVM+classlib was ~50% slower (7 > > secs against 5 sec with SUN) then RI. > > What are your numbers? > > > > On 11/1/06, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, all: > > > Harmony now has been able to pass 100% testcases on Tomcat5.5. I > > ran > > > them both on WindowsXP and Unbuntu, with J9 VM and drlvm. > > > The detailed information about how to build and run tests have > > been > > > put on http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Tomcat. > > > > > > Note: > > > 1. Harmony launches slower than RI, so I add the interval > > between > > > the > > > launch of Tomcat Server and tests from 8 seconds to 30 seconds to > > ensure > > > the server has been running. > > > 2. Runtime.exec fails on linux with J9 vm, as discussed on[1], > > so I > > > have altered the usage of fork to vfork as a workround despite of the > > > possible side-effect of the latter. > > > mailing thread > > > [1] > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg16002.html > > > > > -- > > > Leo Li > > > China Software Development Lab, IBM > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Mikhail Fursov > > > > > > > -- > Leo Li > China Software Development Lab, IBM > -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM
-- Mikhail Fursov
