On the 0x214 day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote: > On 01 Nov 2006 15:56:28 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > agreed. not patching .. just reporting 'golden' VTable refs to GC, am > > I right? > > > Yes, and everytime we report it to GC and GC moves an object - it patches > the address we report.
so, by saying "patching" you insist to put immediate operands into instructions? That's probably worth it, but it extends the JIT<->GC interface. How about making a simple operand (reg/mem) as the first step? -- Egor Pasko, Intel Managed Runtime Division
