Rana,
Aleksey, how would one test this?
FIrst of all acceptance tests should PASS. This is required because jitted code allocation mechanism was changed. The second: I will try to provide one simple test on class unloading today. We can use class unloading implementation in Harmony-2000 to pass it.
The second part is class unloading design implementation (the best >class unloading approach is discussed now). I did not understand, sorry:-) Which best approach?
It was evening already yersteady, so I probably did not expressed my thoughts correctly, :) I ment that there at least 3 proposal in Harmony dev list on class unloading, and "the best approach" is the one accepted by Harmony as best according to different criteria like performance, etc. Aleksey. On 11/2/06, Rana Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/2/06, Aleksey Ignatenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Hi, everyone. > > >I've splitted Harmony-2000 (see details: > >http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2000) patch >with automatic > >class unloading implementation into 2 independent parts: > >1. cleaning native resources (native_sources_cleanup.patch). > >2. automatic unloading design implementation (auto_unloading.patch). > > >The first part is independent for all class unloading designs >and could > be > >commited. Aleksey, how would one test this? >The second part is class unloading design implementation (the best > >class unloading approach is discussed now). I did not understand, sorry:-) Which best approach?
