On 11/10/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hang on - we aren't going to consider this patch quite yet, are we? We have a very active and fruitful discussion going on regarding alternate approaches? geir
This part of the patch does not contain class unloading implementation but instead contain native resources cleanup code, which is required by any choosen class unloading design to be implemented in DRLVM. So, my +1 to commit this part, and hold on with the second, until harmony-dev derives the decision. Regards -- Pavel Pervov, Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
