Weldon, Basically, yes. Algorithms were indeed changed, where interfaces dictated so. Also, several places were optimized out as dead code.
Pavel. On 11/3/06, Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pavel, I just now looked at your latest H1558 patch. Unfortunately the patch won't cleanly apply. It can not be committed yet. In any case, 1558 seems to basically reformat the interfaces that access class specific info. It looks like a bunch of cosmetic changes. No change in underlying algorithms. Is this correct? Aleksey, Pavel, Do you know if there are interdependencies between H1558 and H2000? In any case, I believe H1558 should be committed first. And H2000 will have to pick up the pieces. Everyone, Comments? Suggestions? -- Weldon Washburn Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
-- Pavel Pervov, Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
