Great. Thanks Weldon. Does this mean that it is to be verified on Windows?
On 11/8/06, Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1558 has been committed. It took two commits since I forgot to "svn add" 4 files. All in all, one hundred and twenty one files were committed. Following the commit(s), I did an "rm -rf trunk", svn update, build.sh, " build.sh test" on my linux box. Everything seems to work OK. On 11/8/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > so, how did it go? > > Weldon Washburn wrote: > > On 11/7/06, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> On Friday 03 November 2006 19:18 Weldon Washburn wrote: > >> > H1558 has been a big battle to get it into committable shape. I > would > >> > really like to commit it first. (In fact, Pavel and I are working > >> on it > >> > right now!) > >> > >> The patch in HARMONY-1558 is huge and often is broken by new VM > commits. > >> Shall > >> we make a freeze on VM commits to allow this patch it? Maintaining so > >> many > >> code changes is probably not an easy task. > >> > >> I've tried to apply it today and it doesn't apply cleanly (no surprise, > 5 > >> days > >> passed since the last update). I think some cooperation between VM > >> committers > >> is required to allow this patch to be finally integrated into the code. > >> > >> We should either agree to let it in or let it die. I support the first > >> option. > >> > >> Weldon, Geir, what do you think? > > > > > > Pavel and I will work on 1558 in the next 12 hours. Hopefully > > we will commit it very soon. It has been a very difficult patch to > apply > > for all the reasons you describe. It would be appreciated if you can > hold > > off applying any patches that might modify the same files as 1558. > > > > -- > >> Gregory Shimansky, Intel Middleware Products Division > >> > > > > > > > > -- Weldon Washburn Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
