I agree with Pavel, but I want hear conformation about H1558 is commited first.
Aleksey. On 11/3/06, Pavel Pervov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And yes, patches for H1558 and H2000 will most certainly conflict. I hope, Aleksey will agree on rebasing his patch after my changes will be committed at last. Regards, Pavel. On 11/3/06, Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Pavel, > > I just now looked at your latest H1558 patch. Unfortunately the patch > won't > cleanly apply. It can not be committed yet. In any case, 1558 seems to > basically reformat the interfaces that access class specific info. It > looks > like a bunch of cosmetic changes. No change in underlying algorithms. Is > this correct? > > Aleksey, Pavel, > > Do you know if there are interdependencies between H1558 and H2000? In > any > case, I believe H1558 should be committed first. And H2000 will have to > pick up the pieces. > > Everyone, > > Comments? Suggestions? > > -- > Weldon Washburn > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division > > -- Pavel Pervov, Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
