On the 0x21A day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote: > On 07 Nov 2006 19:08:35 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Another problem: anyone who changes a document behaviour must update > > > comments too :( > > > > excuse me, what is "document behaviour"? :) > > > > Read it as 'method/function behaviour'. I mean if you have good comments in > file you can't submit a patch with code refactoring without update in > comments. Does it become a new requirement?
So, if someone changes semantic of an interface fuction, s/he should document the new semantics. I think, it is a good policy. > IMO we should start to collect metrics and add comments for intercomponent > interfaces only (vm/include/*). OK. But no one can stop us to document other parts occasionally. Do we feel that it is time to set responsibilities on documenting vm/include/* ? -- Egor Pasko
