If you're looking for another opinion, I'm not convinced. JUnit 4.x seems just as capable as TestNG.
IIRC JUnit 4.x doesn't have the rich set of grouping annotations TestNG has. Moreover (again IIRC), JUnit doesn't have it at all. Only TestSuites. Thanks, 2006/11/7, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 11/6/06, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > > > > Paulex Yang wrote: > >> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > >>> did we decide not to go to TestNG? > >> Sigh...I guess there must be too many ones have waited too long for > >> TestNG...(including me) > > > > I don't understand - what do you mean? > Nothing but a joke:). I mean, the TestNG depends on j.u.c, so that it > cannot be used for months, so people may think let's just use JUnit > instead... > > Ignore it, I'm all for TestNG...:) If you're looking for another opinion, I'm not convinced. JUnit 4.x seems just as capable as TestNG.
-- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
