Weldon Washburn wrote:
On 11/8/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Weldon Washburn wrote:
> On 11/7/06, Ivan Volosyuk < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>
>> On 07 Nov 2006 14:35:55 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>> > > I already have one idea how to benefit from movable vtables.
>
>
> There would have to be a very compelling argument for making vtables
> movable. Like a business workload that Harmony needs to run
within the
> next
> 12 months.
How would a business workload need this directly?
That's the point. I can't figure out any compelling story for moving
vtables. As far as I can tell, its over-engineering. I would love to
be proven wrong.
But isn't this simply an implementation detail of something that is
important, namely the class unloading?
geir