Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x21C day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/11/9, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I do think of us having a 'zero regression' policy except in cases where
we make the explicit decision to break. (like we did with TM, for example)
+1 for 'zero regression' unless explicitely agreed
I am +1 for "'zero regression' unless explicitely agreed" at least for
(c/jit-)unit, kernel, classlib tests. Do you think of including
Eclipse UT, DaCapo, etc. to the 'zero regression' set?
That would probably be good, I am afraid of too heavy checks for each
small patch.
This wouldn't be done by each committer - it's too heavy. We'd have CI
running continuously to tell us when we broke something. Our
committment would be to fix things that CI found immediately...
geir
Thanks,
Mikhail
I hesitate to say that again, but we also need to decide about VM we
will use for that release. I like the following mission: "Class library
and DRLVM pass TCK on Ubuntu 6". I'm open for any other mission which is
challenging, understandable and short enough.
Well, we'll need Windows XP and RHEL as well.
Writing down this mission certainly shouldn't inhibit individuals from
achieving other goals at Harmony. But it would help the rest of
community to concentrate on the common task.
1.
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Platforms_to_Run_Harmony_Development_Kit_
on
With best regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Java & XML Engineering
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DRLVM] General stability
2006/11/8, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 11/8/06, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Probably it's time to create some release plan :)
So let's start this discussion?
Good idea!
The only release I can imagine is Harmony Java5SE 100% compatible.
To be Java5SE 100% compatible we need TCK first.
So we could think about some less impressive goal for the first release
:)
SY, Alexey
