Jin Mingjian wrote: > But does Apache License make JDK out of control? I don't think so:)
I think that it just means that it helps them limit the number of proprietary forks of the code. But I'm not worried about that being harmful no matter what the license - the market doesn't want broken Java. geir > > 在 06-11-13，Geir Magnusson Jr.<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道： >> >> >> Jin Mingjian wrote: >> > GPL is not very compatible with Apache License. So, I guess Sun want >> > to prevent Harmony from using any codes they owned?! Very Very Very... >> >> No - it was simply about control. >> >> geir >> >> > >> > 在 06-11-13，LvJimmy，Jing<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道： >> >> Oops！GPL v2? I can hardly believe it! >> >> Does it mean, all codes using Sun's JDK have to take GPL? >> >> Crazy and unbelieveable... However I like GPL ;) >> >> >> >> 在06-11-13，Jin Mingjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道： >> >> > >> >> > Mark Reinhold's blog has confirmed this news. He said: >> >> > ... >> >> > Sun is open-sourcing its entire Java stack―ME, SE, and EE―under the >> >> > GNU General Public License, version 2. >> >> > >> >> > The license choice―which has taken many by surprise (gotcha!)―is a >> >> > giant leap. For more on the big picture, including a link to >> >> > tomorrow's webcast announcement, please see >> >> > http://sun.com/opensource/java. >> >> > ... >> >> > >> >> > link: http://blogs.sun.com/mr/entry/one_giant_leap >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Best Regards! >> >> >> >> Jimmy, Jing Lv >> >> China Software Development Lab, IBM >> >> >>
