Re: Functional programming in Python

[Ketil Malde]

Jerzy Karczmarczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> BTW, before I knew Haskell I exprimented with a syntax in which 'x f'
>> is the application of 'f' to 'x', and 'x f g' means '(x f) g'. 

> Hmmm. An experimental syntax, you say...
> Oh, say, you reinvented FORTH?

Wouldn't 
        x f g
in a Forth'ish machine mean
        g(f,x)   -- using "standard" math notation, for a change
rather than
        g(f(x))
?

-kzm
-- 
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe