29 May 2001 22:44:38 +0200, Ketil Malde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze: > Wouldn't > x f g > in a Forth'ish machine mean > g(f,x) -- using "standard" math notation, for a change > rather than > g(f(x)) > ? It depends whether f changes the value at top of the stack or only puts something there. -- __("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/ \__/ ^^ SYGNATURA ZASTĘPCZA QRCZAK _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
- RE: Functional programming in Python Peter Douglass
- RE: Functional programming in Python Tom Pledger
- RE: Functional programming in Python S. Alexander Jacobson
- RE: Functional programming in Python Malcolm Wallace
- Re: Functional programming in Python Zhanyong Wan
- Re: Functional programming in Python S. Alexander Jacobson
- Re: Functional programming in Python Tom Pledger
- Re: Functional programming in Python Juan Carlos Arevalo Baeza
- Re: Functional programming in Python Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Functional programming in Python Jerzy Karczmarczuk
- Re: Functional programming in Python Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Functional programming in Python Ketil Malde
- Re: Functional programming in Python Brook Conner