Thank you for saying what I was too lazy to say myself. :)
-- Lennart
Jan-Willem Maessen wrote:
On May 10, 2005, at 4:14 AM, Bo Herlin wrote:
> Well, part of what I was doing was experimenting with what a library like
> this should look like, even more than what it should do. For some reason,
> I kind of like writing this:
>
> *Math.Prime> is Prime 42
> False
>
> instead of this:
>
> *Math.Prime> isPrime 42
> False
Great! I like this a LOT.
Why not use a function?
What's wrong with a function?
There no need to go leaping for a multiparameter type class with a functional dependency! Just use a function.
[With apologies to John Cleese]
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
